But what I assumed would happen and what actually happened at the Grand Opening were so diametrically opposed in terms of experience that I actually deleted that first post to write this one instead.
![]() |
| I don't know, Target. I'm not really feeling it, you know? |
Nothing makes me sadder than when something I've been waiting super-excitedly for turns out to be a disappointment (I'm looking at you, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire). Partly the problem is mine: I think I expect too much. In this case, I've been stalking the store since the official announcement came down the pipe. The body wasn't even cold (Zellers, I mean) before I was full-steam-ahead planning my Target onslaught.
Given it's location in town, it was easy to drive by every day to check on the building process. Which I did. A lot. And when the little notice popped up in my Facebook feed that the pilot store was opening today, you better believe it went straight into my calendar. Target and I... we had a date with destiny.
I was less impressed when I had to park more than two blocks away from the store to get any parking space at all. I didn't assume I would be the only one there, but I thought in the middle of a workday ~ smack-dab in the middle of the workweek! ~ that crowds would be a little thinner. Not so, as it turned out. The crowd was more than healthy. Clearly, a good start for them.
I took a few preliminary shots with Jimmy, the new love of my life (more on him later), and was no more than 30 steps inside the store -- and five photos into my tour -- when an associate rushed up to me in boy's wear and said, "No! No thank you. No photos please."
My mistake! Usually I'm pretty good about asking folks to take photos in their shop, especially smaller retailers who offer unique or one-of-a-kind products and who generally have a small online presence. (does this sounds like Target to you?) Photography can be a touchy issue for some independents, and I try to be very sensitive to that fact. But Target is neither small, nor independent, nor unique, and I think we can agree that their online presence is considerable. Besides which, the store was inundated with local media outlets; cameras were everywhere. I was frankly surprised that they managed to single me out.
So when I apologized (profusely) and let them know I was there for media purposes ~ that I ran a small local blog ("Here's my card...") and was excited to be writing a post about the launch ~ I expected it to smooth the waters. It usually does. Instead, she looked at me and said again, more firmly, "I'm sorry. No photos."
I then asked if there was a media office I could connect with onsite. If it was a matter of obtaining credentials, I thought, I'll just pop in right now and git'er done. I smiled. She smiled back. Then: "Hold on, I'll call someone." Someone. But not the media office? No, not the media office.
We were joined a moment later by another woman who was, I guessed, a floor manager. I repeated my request. Smiled winningly. Looked harmless. Waved my camera in her face a little, sort of tempting-like. Handed her my card. Smiled again: full teeth, raised eyebrows. You know.... hopeful.
"No," the new woman said. "Sorry. We have enough media."
Umm... I'm sorry. What? Is there such a such as enough media? I'm speaking generally of course, but also specifically: Target's warm welcome to our fair northern shores isn't universal. I know of many ~ my own friends and family among them ~ who are completely and totally against the brand invasion. They view it similar to the arrival of Wal-Mart and other wildlife: a foreign specious infiltrating our habitat and devastating the native population of retailers (as with the brown tree snake, so too with Wal-Mart)
As a lover of cute, affordable lamp shades and place settings and area rugs, I don't mind the invasion. More concerning to me is the antiquated approach to social media management. To give credit where credit is due, Target has one of the most effective marketing campaigns out there. Without their amazing branding, they're just another box store full of discounted goods of middling quality. Yes, they've got the fashion-forward angle going for them, especially when it comes to housewares, but what sets them apart from their competitors is purely advertorial.
So it stands to reason ~ and I fully understand ~ that part of their marketing success stems from controlling their messaging with an iron fist. It also stands to reason that blogs, living as they do in the badlands of traditional media, may not be the type of media they want to rub shoulders with.
But here's the real rub: blogs are out there. Social media is now the driving force behind consumer decisions in this country for the under-40 demographic: it can - and does! - deeply influence the purchasing choices of Canadians. It's not something to be trifled with, no matter how huge or how successful you are.
And granted, Money Pit Love is small and maybe a larger, well-known blog would not have received the same reception. But they don't know how small ~ or big ~ this blog is, nor can they control what happens on any other social medium (because naturally, I immediately shared my experience on Twitter, where there are no do-overs. It's out there. Interesting side note? While I've been deep in conversations with several of my Tweeple who share my view on this type of media management, Target Canada hasn't responded to any of our missives. Not once. A serious fail in message management, in my opinion).
Furthermore, I fail to understand exactly what they are attempting to protect. Any and every product they carry is online and readily available, including pricing information, descriptions and photography. Clearly, the production value of photography is better: professional versus amateur wins every time. But outside of that, what state secrets are being protected by disallowing photography in-situ? Or more specifically, what secrets are being protected by disallowing camera photography in-situ?? Because had I wanted to take photos with my phone, she "couldn't stop me. But cameras are not allowed."
Social media is a powerful tool that, like any other tool, can be useful or dangerous depending on how you treat it. I don't presume that this one little review on this one little blog will make any difference whatsoever in the success or failure of Target's expansion into Canada ~ that would be a ridiculous expectation. But what I am is one little drop in an ocean of bloggers that grows larger and more influential every year.
Blogs are no longer on the outskirts of mainstream media, they ARE mainstream media. It's time that retailers large and small learned to adapt.
Brown tree snake image via National Geographic



Wonderful post April! Let us know whether Target ever replies to your tweets today (or this post).
ReplyDeletePS - I completely agree about HPATGOF - What were they thinking casting Robert Pattinson as the Hot boy? Um, no.
Nothing so far...isn't that amazing?! I mean, I know they're huge and I'm little, but still.
DeleteHPATGOF -- I am so WITH YOU on that. RPatz = puh-lease. Also, they cut out huge portions of the plot line that were REALLY IMPORTANT later on. Just completely unnecessary IMO :)
Complete and utter fail. And that Twitter handle is a joke. And yes, this is my professional opinion.
ReplyDeleteMy thoughts exactly.
Deletewow..too bad you were treated this way. So much hype...sounds like it just stayed hype?
ReplyDeleteFrom what I've heard through the grapevine, it's not all it's cracked up to be. My experience aside (because really, who am I? A little nobody), from what I've heard on the news and from other blog, etc. it's not nearly as good as we had all thought/hoped. Have you checked it out yet? What did you think?
DeleteSuch a strange response to someone wanting to do a post about the new store. Totally leaves a bad taste in your mouth. I was looking forward to Target opening (well I still am interested in seeing the merchandise), but will have to be careful about the photography. The funny thing is I know that they post photos all the time on "Young House Love" of things they see at Target that they like.
ReplyDeleteI know! Which is why it was such a strange experience. I completely understand when smaller independents decline to be photographed, and fair enough. But this was exceptionally weird, and an interesting area to draw the line especially in light of how many others photograph the same store for their blogs. Maybe it's just a Canadian ban? LOL
DeleteSo sad! I absolutely LOVE Target! It's my favorite store ever, but I'm so sad that you didn't have a good impression.
ReplyDelete"Favourite store ever" is a VERY strong statement. Maybe I'll have to forgive and forget, and give them another chance? :)
Delete...
ReplyDeleteSince when did a department store ban photography? I'm with you on respecting the wishes of small boutique owners, but... is it even legal?
Your experience totally leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I'll still check out Target when they finally arrive near me, but I gotta say, I've heard a few other things that already have me underwhelmed.
Me too (re: hearing underwhelming reports), though I question whether it's more about what we assumed it would be rather than what they ever claimed to be. I've heard quite a few folks complain that the deals aren't as good as they are Stateside, but they can't possibly be. Our retail regulations are set up to support or accommodate US-style pricing. So we were bound to be disappointed.
DeleteI'm still dead curious about their housewares, though. I saw a woman leaving the store with the cutest lampshade in yellow quatrefoil fabric and I died. DIED. Which just made me more mad! LOL
Let me know what you think when you go. Maybe we can band together and overwhelm them with cameras. If we go as a group/mob, they can't possibly say no. Can they? :)
A bad start to their first day, I'm not a blogger but without all the lovely blogs out there I say you are the new media, I hardly ever watch House and Home TV, I only subscribe to 1/2 the amount of magazines out there. I appreciate all the hard work and passion that goes into the blogs I subscribe to and get a daily doze of design and inspiration in my inbox daily so thank you bloggers.
ReplyDeleteTime for Retailers to take note and run with the free promotion that only bloggers can give you. Or what have you got to hide?
cheers
Margo on Vancouver island
Hi Margo! I totally agree when it comes to capitalizing on free promotion: who wouldn't want to take advantage? But I suppose at the end of the day, their success will reflect their policies. At least ... we can hope!
DeleteHI April! I'm a new follower, loving your blog and this honest review. I too was anxiously looking forward to Target's arrival. I haven't yet had a chance to visit one of the new target locations..but this post makes my blood boil and I wasn't even there! Shame on them for this ridiculous rule. I think they missed a great opportunity because whether your blog is big or small, it's pretty amazing! Happy to be following along.
ReplyDeleteAlso I can't wait to hear about Jimmy! I'm in the market for a Canon and look forward to your feedback! xo
Hi Tiffany,
DeleteWelcome, welcome, welcome! So glad to meet you!
It's definitely a missed opportunity for them from a much larger perspective (like I said, I'm just one little drop in an ocean of bloggers) but hopefully if enough folks share their experiences it will be enough to turn the tides. Have you been yet? What did you think?
As for Jimmy, I'm aiming to get a post out this week... I can't wait to share about him. I love him! We'll have much to discuss :)
Wow. What an 'fail' by Target. A serious PR cock-up if you ask me. Thanks for sharing your experience April!
ReplyDeleteIt makes me sad... I really want to be a Target junkie! And now I can't. Target has wrecked Target for me. LOL :)
DeleteHaving worked retail (on the floor, and in the head office side) I'm sympathetic to that the store managers are following a blanket "rule" from someone above them. That being said - it's not the "no camera" policy that shocked me (which for smaller stores I know is done for certain reasons like competition) it was the "We have enough media" comment. Um. Yuck. I don't even know how to address that.
ReplyDeleteGoing back to the "no camera" policy though, I am a little surprised. Target Homegoods has had a loyal following from Design bloggers in the USA - people snapping pictures and posting them ALL THE TIME. So, I'm super shocked that they have this policy.
Shoana Jensen did a post full of Target products, likely flew under the radar because of the photos being snapped with her phone vs. a bigger camera like yours? Weird. http://shoanajensen.com/2013/03/06/target-is-here/
I'm bummed you had this experience.
To be honest, it was precisely those two elements of my experience that surprised and frustrated me the most. If there is a no-photo policy in place, I happen to disagree with it, but so be it. It's their shop, after all. I can and do respect the rules, even if I don't happen to think they're valid or worth upholding.
DeleteHowever, that they distinguish between -- and apply separate policies to -- camera photography versus phone photography, is outrageous. Clearly it cannot be a quality control issue as phone pics are notoriously bad, despite the advent of Instagram and such to glam them up. And a phone photo is often put immediately out into the world, "as is." Camera photos -- at least mine -- would need to be downloaded, adjusted and touched up to ensure the best possible image, then posted... all efforts to make the subject look BETTER, not worse. It's a confusing, contrarian approach.
I feel for the employees, who were clearly inundated that first date. It was truly a mad house. But referring me to the onsite media office (and I'm 100% positive there was one) would have been just as easy as making such a questionable comment, and probably would have made the experience a better one for everyone. And I'm STILL sad about it. I really wanted some Nate Berkus gold-dipped vases!!! :)
Yup, when I typed my reply I must admit I didn't notice that you wrote that they said that if you had a camera on your phone, they couldn't stop you. Sorry, my reply may have been slightly different.
DeleteI was thinking about it over the last few days from a company perspective and from my spot as writing a blog. I guess I realized that when a company looks to implement policies they look at what likely will happen - so the everyday consumer is likely walking around with a camera in their pocket - which they obviously don't mind. Maybe that is what the sales clerk should have said instead instead of "we can't stop you" but instead "Phone cameras are fine, but professional photography has to be approved with head office". But typically people aren't walking around with DSLR's - So although I'm on your side because I sympathize as someone who writes a blog, I also *kind of* understand their policy.
I just think it's a really interesting discussion, I hope my comments aren't mistaken as anything other than just liking to chat about blogs/technology and how brands respond.
I contacted them through Facebook and got nothing. I am shocked! Other retailers like West Elm and Crate and Barrel welcome bloggers - we even had VIP tours before the store opened, swag bags and gift cards - talk about feeling included. Phooey on Target.
ReplyDeleteI know, it's so strange, right? There's been no real outreach at all to bloggers, as far as I can see (not basing this on my own experience because again, I'm pretty little, but the big ones are being shut out too) and despite all the chatter on Twitter regarding the opening -- and mine wasn't the only complaint -- Target has remained completely silent. It's a very, very weird approach. Not sure what their end game is??
DeleteHonestly I'm not that surprised. Canadian retailers in general tend to not "get" the blogging thing. I realize Target is an American company...but even the Canadian version of Lowes is virtually silent compared to all of the work they do with bloggers south of the border.
ReplyDeleteBarrie is supposed to get a store at some point, I'm not sure I'll be rushing into it whenever it opens.
It's true, though as Barbara mentioned, retailers like Crate & Barrel and especially West Elm are ALL OVER bloggers. They love 'em! And to be honest, if that's their policy, that's their policy. I don't have to agree with it to respect it. The issue I have is with inconsistency and, quite frankly, rudeness. There was no call for that.
DeleteOnce the Barrie store opens up, I dare you to bring your camera in. Would love to hear if you get a different reception!
You were more likely dealing with a stressed out new employee who doesn't write policy or necessarily understand it completely trying to make sure his corner of the world (and then the higher level person's corner of the world) was covered.
ReplyDeleteI'd have just shrugged, wandered away, and taken some pictures in a different area.
Some department store personnel also get touchy about photography. It's private property in that regard and they are allowed to ask you to stop. It may seem silly these days with ubiquitous camera phones and such, but I doubt most corporate policy has actually changed with the times - just the applications of those policies.
Chances are any mainstream media who covered it attended a special, highly produced media affair with press packets and handlers.
I wouldn't hold it against the store for forever.
You are absolutely right: they are 100% within their rights to ask me to stop taking photos. It is private property, and I don't have to agree with them to respect their request (and their right to make it), which is why I stopped taking photos immediately.
DeleteThat being said, Target is a marketing monster and any failure on the part of an employee (or two) not knowing how to handle something as simple as a blogger with a camera is a serious fail on their part. So much anticipation and hype about their Canadian debut combined with their iron-fisted approach to brand management in general makes it frankly impossible to imagine that staff weren't trained to respond to this exact scenario.
However, either way -- trained or not -- it's indicative of a deeper branding/management issue. More than the experience itself (though I'm still pretty ticked off about it), my complaint centres on their overall media approach to blogs and bloggers, which is non-existent. It's an unfortunate stance for them to take, and I doubt it will serve their long-term goals (though maybe they're the GM of discount goods? Too big to fail?)
I've heard disappointing things about the new stores as well, in terms of products and pricing. The way they handled you taking photos doesn't impress me. I didn't know such a thing as 'too much media' could exist. I'm visiting the one in Guelph tonight, kind of expecting to be disappointed and I haven't even gone yet...
ReplyDeleteI think everyone expected the prices to be as cheap as they'd be in the States, but our retail structure is not set up to support that kind of pricing. It was the same complaint everyone had when Wal-Mart opened up, but you see how quickly folks got over it. We'll pay more because we expect to pay more; it's really that simple. Because more than you want to pay at Target is still less than you'd need to pay at HomeSense/Winners, and the stuff is just as cute (if not as durable). I expect Canadians will fuss for about 5 minutes and then get on with it :)
DeleteHow was the one in Guelph? What did you think? As I didn't even get 30 steps inside the door, I don't even have enough information to form an opinion!
I think its fair for them to decide what they do or don't want, just as its fine for you to have an opinion about it. Not a big deal to me.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely, but policies are more effective when they're not contradictory. I don't really care about the policy itself, it was the inconsistency and, quite frankly, the rudeness. None of it was necessary. All of it was unfortunate.
DeleteThis is an excellent post April, an interesting read and a surprising stance. I am hoping you get at least a response at some point. Perhaps there is a good reason for how you recieved, but "we have enough media" isn't good enough in my view.
ReplyDeleteThanks Lindsey, and I agree 100%. Their rules are their rules are their rules. They should be consistent. They should MAKE SENSE. But they are theirs are to make and enforce. But as I replied to another commenter: Target is a marketing machine and the idea that either staff WEREN'T trained to deal with an issue like the one I presented, or they WERE (and we assume that woman's statement is reflective of the company's official stance on blogging media) smacks of brand management failure either way. I'm going to approach them directly for media access and see what happens next. Stay tuned!
DeleteI have just been introduced to the blogging world, in the past few months. I live in the US and have seen Target's merchandise featured on many blogs. In one case, I actually purchased an item that I saw on a blog. Your experience really irritates me and, though Target had been my "go to" store, I think I will be shopping around a little more. It seems, as my daddy would say, Target has gotten to big for their britches!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment, and welcome to the Money Pit! (and to the blogging world in general).
DeleteMy experience made me wonder the same thing: if it's a too-big-to-fail mentality. And, likely, they are. People will shop there regardless: first for the novelty (speaking specifically of Canadians here, who will be so excited they no longer have to make a run for the border for merchandise that they'll be happy to overlook more expensive pricing) and then for the convenience/pricing (Target will still be cheaper than HomeSense here in Canada, and with more consistent product offerings).
Target doesn't have to play nice to be successful. But because you don't have to, makes it all that much more important that you do. There's no downside for them to play nice, and only upside if they do. So my question is: what's the hold up? We're Canadian... we like "nice." :)
wow, pretty shocking and antiquated sounding April!
ReplyDeleteAnd sad.... I'm still pining for cute lampshades and Nate Berkus vases!! :(
DeleteI originally read this post a couple of days ago and felt the same indignation that the blogger expressed, but a few things have stuck with me. The last few paragraphs on blogging being here to stay is true, but at the same time bloggers may need to realize that the ask forgiveness instead of permission approach may not bring about a lot of good will from companies like Target, who have a system in plae for dealing with media. If bloggers are serious about being taken seriously, then they should also have the courtesy to go through the proper channels and allow for an appropriate response.
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree, which is why I asked to be referred to the media office. I always ask permission of smaller outlets and independents; I very much wish to be taken seriously and always to engender partnerships with folks I want to feature. Most big box Canadian retailers, however, don't have any issue with in-store photography, so it's generally rare -- and a surprise -- when we run into one who does.
DeleteTarget is a new commodity here and most of our collective knowledge of the brand stems from advertorial campaigns and what we see on the internet. Namely, what we see on blogs. And I would have been happy to go through the proper channels for media access had I known there were any to navigate. There has been no blogger outreach to speak of, the combination of which allows us to draw the conclusion that a) blogs are welcome (since we see Target so deeply represented in American blogs) and b) special access is not required.
Clearly, I made the wrong assumption and would have been happy to correct it, given the opportunity: I don't have a sense of entitlement when it comes to features, etc. and would have pursued the appropriate channels if I had been directed there. But we're missing the point.
The issue at hand is not the policy itself: the issue is the INCONSISTENCY of application (ie. I could take photos on my phone, but not with my camera) and the ATTITUDE ("we have enough media" is not good enough). That's the real problem. Everything else is just details.
Very interesting post...and very archaic approach to media! I'm shocked to be honest, hopefully they will smarten up.
ReplyDeleteI know... I'm so disappointed. I'm going to approach them directly for media access and see what happens next.
DeleteReally interesting post, April! Pretty shocking, really.
ReplyDeleteGood for you!
Yikes, sounds like Target Canada needs to get off their high horse! They have enough media?! That's pretty much the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. How arrogant and condescending. I'm SO glad you posted about this and are calling them out - I was so excited about Target opening too but this has put a pretty sour taste in my mouth! Doubt I'll be rushing in any time soon.
ReplyDeleteGreat post April, you are so right about the power of social media. Whatever their intentions or rules, there seems to be a new need for training on the 'new' media - even if that just means how to say no in a way that won't end up all over the interwebs! I assume, based on the lack of coverage in general for this event, that this was a soft launch for them in Canada, where they work out all the kinks of doing business up here, and that the first store to open in Toronto will receive the mage-coverage. Hopefully they will have someone doing 'target Canada' searches who will notice that this is a kink, and make sure that they include bloggers in their Toronto-event. :)
ReplyDeleteIn full disclosure, I'm an american, living in Minneapolis, MN, where Target is headquartered. I stumbled upon this post through another blog and was quite surprised by the experience you received at a Target store. First off, I grew up going to Target, worked there in highschool, and have had the opportunity to do work at Target headquarters as a contractor. I can assure you that a Target store would not have a media office within the building. The best you could do is talk to the store team leader(which may have been who you spoke with), but if you wanted to talk to true Media team members, you'd have to reach out to someone at headquarters. Second, Target loves bloggers and partner's with them regularly. They have an online magazine that features bloggers frequently. I can tell you first hand that they value the future of social media and the changes that it is driving in the retail world.
ReplyDeleteIf you would like a response from Target I would try reaching out to them directly through email or phone rather than tweeting at them your disappointment. While twitter is a great social media platform it isn't always the best place for resolving conflict or addressing concerns.
Finally, I'd like to believe that the "Sorry, we have enough Media" comment was coming from someone who was overwhelmed on the first day of a highly anticipated store opening. On any other day no one would mind you taking pictures. Someone probably heard the policy at Training days before and was just trying their best to be a good employee. I'm hoping that you will give Target another chance and learn to love it like so many americans do.